Lady's Island Surveys
HOW DO YOU FEEL ABOUT A LADY'S ISLAND WAL-MART?
The Wal-Mart Corporation recently requested City of Beaufort approval to build and operate a super center type of Wal-Mart store at the intersection of Sea Island Parkway and Airport Circle. On February 11 the City of Beaufort Zoning Administrator ruled that the request did not conform with the approved Planned Unit Development agreement for the property in question and on those grounds denied the request. This decision can be appealed to the City of Beaufort Zoning Board of Appeals. Separate from the PUD is a Development Agreement which sets forth specific details for development of the property and is scheduled to expire on February 25. The property owner has requested and the City has agreed to consider an extension of this agreement or a modified form of it.
 
February 2008 Lady's Island Survey Results
Should a Wal-Mart super center store be approved for Lady's Island?
Yes - Increases convenience, employment, taxes. 21.7% (38)
No - Negative impact on local businesses and infrastructure. 74.9% (131)
Don't Know - Need more info regarding +/- impact on our community. 3.4% (6)
User Comments
02-25-2008 18:44:22 - Rich Gibbons: The land in question is a CHOKE point on 21 and Lady's Island. How are we going to get by this point and all it's traffic?
02-21-2008 15:40:41 - Daniel Pierce: The one in Beaufort is close enough.
02-16-2008 16:26:47 - Cissy Nichols: There is already a Wal-Mart in Beaufort. I would prefer a Target built in an Island style and to blend in with our beautiful surroundings.
02-15-2008 20:41:34 - AE Rickard: Go for it!
02-13-2008 13:19:30 - O'Brien: If Walmart comes, so will everyone else. Let's leave somethings natural, as God intended them to be.
02-13-2008 08:33:02 - JB: Everyone keeps talking about all the traffic congestion this would cause. What about the fact that the Woods and McTeer bridges would have less traffic because more people would stay on Lady's Island? Beaufort is a unique community! Allow Walgreens to install a sign and then try to fine them because it was approved, make Outback change their roof color, etc, etc. Maybe if Target, Kohls or Bed Bath and Beyond wanted to build, it would be okay. But not WalMart!!!!
02-13-2008 07:25:49 - Julia Hetherington: Businesses going under because of the direct competition of Walmart is obvious. But the traffic impacts businesses in other ways. When the bridge was down, our business (Physical Therapy) suffered because people did not want to "deal with the traffic." Walmart would bring way too much traffic for our roads to handle.
02-12-2008 15:22:26 - Peter King: Walmart is no dummy. They will have surveyed the store's feasibility. Of course, aestheticssdsoes not enter their mind. The land owners, whoever they are, are known to be greedy opportunists looking for big bucks. People will go there in droves if it is built. We would not set foot in the place, but as a taxpayer, I object very much. Some people will sacrifice their all. Real estate values will plummet. So much for my opinion.
02-12-2008 14:45:36 - Lois Driscoll: What will be built instead. It is zoned industrial Comercial?
02-12-2008 14:08:13 - Arthur Looney: We already have a Walmart super center; no need to clog up rt 21 traffic for another one.
02-12-2008 12:52:03 - Jerry Stone: There are plenty of other locations other than the Sea Islands to place big box stores. The Sea Islands should be kept as pure as possible.
02-12-2008 12:09:08 - Jenifer Lugar: A superstore is a bad idea for this area - it will have ripple effects for hwy 21 for runaway growth. And not the kind we want.
02-12-2008 09:59:11 - Rosa Lee Vitez: Feel this will totaly change the area and not for the good of the community...all the charm and ways of life will be changed forever, as well as all the small business owners that have been soooo important to this part of the community...do not feel they need another WalMart within 7 miles of the other....the impact to the natural areas would be devestating....hope our elected officials will take time to re-evaluate this project to protect our environment...anything that has to have 7 feet of extra dirt, and be built on stilts is not viable......
02-12-2008 09:39:35 - joseph happe: we already have one..leave the island a quaint place to live!!
02-12-2008 08:59:04 - Frederic Houle: Store much too large. resulting traffic delays will be a total nightmare.
02-12-2008 08:12:17 - Ed Hill: Envioronmental Hazard, Traffic Congestion, Overuse of bridges, Loss of local businesses
02-12-2008 07:57:33 - Carol H Morgan: I so enjoyed going to Hilton Head in the 70's and early 80's until developers turned it in to the zoo it is today. Don't let this happen to Beaufort. Besides as someone said in today's paper, let them get the existing store in order. It is not an incovenience to drive to that store.
02-12-2008 07:09:14 - Stephen Krakehl: Wal-Mart has never been a good neighbor. If the Beaufort City Council wants to put another nail in the struggling downtown business coffin all they need to do is approve Wal-Mart.
02-12-2008 06:46:40 - Judith McAuley: Walmart already has a store here which is more than adequate to serve the needs of the community.
02-12-2008 06:40:47 - Bernard McAuley: Wal-Mart has a store within 15--20 miles of the proposed location. The present store has served Ladys, St. Helena Harbour, and Fripp Island very adequately. Another store, with all of the negative impacts that Wal-Mart inevitably brings, doesn't make any sense.
02-11-2008 21:37:04 - Ashleigh Sawdon: It's 6 additional minutes to the current WalMart. And that WalMart is in an area where the infrastructure will support it. Lady's Island is not in a position to support a business the size and scope of a Wal-Mart.
02-11-2008 21:26:54 - Kenneth Hirsch: We rely on a single road, Sea Island Parkway, for all travel and it is already overloaded. It will be difficult keeping up with the growth in population and development without adding this big box store. The history of Wal-Mart is that it kills smaller local retail business, costing more jobs than it creates, and harming the local economic backbone of our community. We do not want to replicate Bluffton here.
02-11-2008 21:23:18 - Susan Dickson: Until there is a new bridge, there shouldn't be anything that brings so much more traffic onto the island.
02-11-2008 20:30:32 - Virginia Lurcott: Why could we possibly need another Walmart. Besides conjestion,it will mar the beauty and atmosphere of the barrior islands.
02-11-2008 19:45:24 - Jack Sparacino: We moved to St. Helena Island 3 years ago in large part because of the relatively unspoiled environment which is simply magnificent. Adding a WalMart here is not only guaranteed to add an eyesore to the area, but virtually certain to aggravate traffic problems, promote chemical runoff, and threaten the viability of local businesses. I believe we need a WalMart here like we need an outbreak of malaria.
02-11-2008 19:34:17 - harriet gallow: one wal-mart is all we need - why would we want to have another one?
02-11-2008 19:09:35 - Bill Carpenter: We have no need for another box store! Keep this type of development on Robert Smalls Parkway and Ribaut Road, where there is already a large commercial presence. Keep the Sea Islands natural! This is where their true beauty lies!! To develop this huge box store and parking lot will be greatly detrimental to our natural wildlife and their natural marsh home.
02-11-2008 19:07:12 - Carol Carpenter: There is a Wal-mart within 5 miles of the current requested site. We have too much at stake...environmental issues, economic issues, and traffic issues that make this request ridiculous! We have no need for 2 WalMarts within 5 miles of each other! Keep this natural part of the low country sea islands in their natural state and don't encumber our environment with more run-off into our beautiful, natural marshes!!
02-11-2008 19:04:41 - John Myers: The increased traffic in that location and on all the overtaxed bridges will be excessive. One super Wal-mart is more than adequate for Beaufort.
02-11-2008 18:33:38 - George & kathyJohnston: Traffic nightmare & environmental disaster.
02-11-2008 18:17:06 - Alice Massey: What environmental safeguards can the city guarantee us regarding this project?
What traffic impact studies is the city using in their decision making?
These are questions that need to be answered before a rational decision can be made.
I would prefer not to have Wal-Mart on that site but if it has to be I would hope that it could be constructed in a way to not negatively impact the fragile environement surrounding the site.
Will I shop there? NO, I do not shop at Wal-Mart now and I won't i the future.
02-11-2008 18:06:25 - wehrenberg: most concerned about impact on traffic and environment
02-11-2008 18:05:31 - Patricia B. Stevens: It will be a disaster for this area! Too much fill, too much cement and too much traffic on too few roads.
02-11-2008 17:37:51 - Anne Williams: Lady's Island does NOT need a Wal-Mart! The roads will not be able to handle the additional traffic and it will have adverse affects to the marshlands.
02-11-2008 17:27:16 - elizabeth blair: Absolutely NOT! It would be a traffic and culture nightmare.
02-11-2008 17:15:51 - Rebecca McCann: I am very opposed to the construction of a Wal-Mart on Lady's Island for many reasons: environmental impact, increased traffic, loss of jobs, impact on local businesses and because there is a Wal-Mart already in our area. Please DO NOT allow a Wal-Mart to build on Lady's Island.
02-11-2008 17:15:46 - Dean Hewitt: Some 30,000 residents of Fripp, Harbor, St Helena, Dataw, Distant Cat Coosaw,and Lady's Islands are underserved by commercial infrastructure. This leads to thousands of round trips a day across the two bridges to do their shopping. To be able to afford themselves of the economy of a Wal Mart these residents must travel 20 to 60 miles round trip costing $3 to $10 in gasoline per trip. To afford themselves the benefit of the jobs created by a Supercenter is prohibitive to some because of the commuting costs. These extra costs diminish the opportunity of a large segment of poor and near poor residents of some of these islands to access an ecomomical source of retail products. Beaufort proper, Port Royal, Burton, Mossy Oaks and west have their super shopping centers. Let the growng population of Lady's and St. Helena Islands have theirs and reduce their costs while saving gasoline, pollution, and across the river congestion.
02-11-2008 17:14:36 - Ralph Bricker: This store will be an asset to the community, in providing low cost prescriptions, groceries, and other merchandise.
02-11-2008 17:11:50 - Bernie Moscovitz: Council should LISTEN to what the people want. Two WalMarts within seven miles of each other in this area is insanity
02-11-2008 17:05:40 - Walker Henry: My feeling is not directed at Wal-Mart which I use frequently but rather at the negative environmental impact a store of that type would have on Lady's Island and the surrounding communities
02-11-2008 17:02:46 - James H. Gourd: Traffic, we already have one 7 minutes away from proposed site,flood plane problems, negative impact on local long standing businesses; ie, Grayco, Walgreens, Publix, St. Helena Market and the list goes on and on...Changes the whole personality of the island...WE DO NOT NEED ANOTHER WALMART JUST TO BROADEN THE TAX BASE!!!!!
02-11-2008 17:00:31 - Holly Dolan: A large store complex near the airport/marsh area is a disaster for both the existing roads and bridges and the environment. Find a moe suitable location.
02-11-2008 16:58:08 - Ellen Corbett: NO, NO, NO! One Wal-Mart in town is enough. This would just be the beginning of more and more large-scale commercial development on the island. Once one large business is allowed in, others will follow quickly and we would soon become another Bluffton/Hilton Head Route 278. The traffic would be horrendous, and the roads are simply not adequate to accommodate all the extra vehicles. And, it would most certainly put many, if not all, of our local shops out of business. And, these are the stores that have been around for years, contributing to the community and local causes and treating their customers in a friendly, personal and helpful manner -- a far cry from the likes of a Wal-Mart! Is this the thanks our wonderful local shop owners deserve?
02-11-2008 16:57:08 - Larry Lance: We need new and thorough studies of environmental impact, traffic studies and impact on local business.
02-11-2008 16:56:56 - R Mueller: Studies need to be completed before any further discussion. But we cannot forget the backup of traffic all the way to Fripp with the bridge outage last spring.
02-11-2008 16:44:55 - Don Bowers: The existing Wal-Mart meets the needs of Northern Beaufort County, both present and future.
02-11-2008 16:42:35 - Rosemary L. Little: Opens the door for future "super" commercial development. Also will affect flood control in the area.
02-11-2008 16:38:34 - Tim and Lynn Maher: WE feel this is a huge negative for folks living on St. Helena and Ladies Islands. The environmental and traffic impact will be enormous. This is only a way for the City of Beaufort to obtain a ratable without considering the impact on residents on the islands. To think that we can't drive 5 or 6 more miles to go to a Wal-mart is ridiculous. We urge the city to come to its senses and vote this down.
02-11-2008 16:34:14 - R. Nalwasky: This is NOT the place for another wallmart. The one in the area is sufficient. Environmental impact too great.
02-11-2008 16:30:29 - Robert Brandriff: The major asset of Lady's Island and the surroundings is the natural beauty of the low country. A Wal-Mart is a major detraction.
02-11-2008 16:27:13 - J Foutch: Or, we can drive across town - and nominate ourselves for a "Friends of OPEC" award.
02-11-2008 16:26:51 - M. McKeown: Wal-Mart's appearance on Ladys Island wil spell doom for the local business' along Hwy 21. The tire shope will not be able to compete, the paint store, etc. Plus, the highway will not handle the increase of traffic volume. The timing of the traffic light at 21 and 802 will have to be revised.
02-11-2008 16:07:53 - Frank Hager: Infrastructure cannot support this type of retail activity. Damage to the ecologically sensitive Wasaw flats loated directly behind the site would prove to be disastrous. Traffic congestion in Beaufort, Ladies Island, and surrounds would be a nightmare. Forget the retail impact, think about trying to get to a doctor, dentist, or other professional appointment. We simply DO NOT NEED A SECOND WALL MART IN NORTHERN BEAUFORT COUNTY
02-11-2008 08:32:42 - Rob McFee: On pages 8 and 9 of the traffic report there are some items that I believe need a closer look. The report states that not all trips would be 'external trips'. As this reduces the traffic footprint in the analysis I think this should be justified further. Also we are given 4505 new trips in and out to be the estimated load. I believe we should be given (or should find out) what the existing traffic counts are at the existing Wal-mart on SC 170. If 4505 is an understatement it raises questions about the whole report. Also the impact on the two bridges to LI do not seem to be addressed. Finally it should be noted Kimley-Horn is the Lady's Island Bypass designer for Beaufort County as well as the author of this report. Any errors or weak points in their previous work would most likely not get a fair or timely correction under these circumstances.
02-09-2008 20:10:23 - Peggy Allard: The negative impact on small business owners on all the islands, not just Lady's Island would be significant. Additionally, the profits of locally owned business are generally fed back into the local economy. The profits of Big Box companies leave the area; they do not benefit the local economy. The owners don’t live here. Jobs will be lost when the small business are forced to close. The traffic is already much heavier and if this were added it would be more than the area can handle and decrease the quality of life on the island. Environmentally, a building and parking lot of that size creates storm water run-off, which carries pollutants directly into our marshes, threatening an already stressed area. I realize building will continue but we must be vigilant in ensuring that it does not ruin the unique ecosystem and the exceptional quality of life we all enjoy.
02-09-2008 10:18:42 - Mark Generales: For better then 8 years I did all I could to protect the Lady's Island side of the river from continued encroachment by the City of Beaufort. Unfortunately, the leadership form our side of the river has agreed with Bill Rauch and sold out our future. They have backed the annexation zones Rauch wanted in the Northern Regional Plan and have told Rauch that ultimately they agree with his annexing ALL of Lady's Island. Given this sell-out, no one should be surprised by this action. But it should be remembered that public actions did stop McLeod - Clarendon. I believe public opposition to any big box on the Lady's Island side of the river can be stopped. Remember - the County ordinances do not allow for big boxes anywhere east of the river. We must get organized and deal with this with facts. The County has done the traffic studies - the big box won't work. And the aesthetic destruction of our area will be dramatic. In the end, this is why I have always called for Lady's Island to incorporate.
Be at the Armory - this one is important
02-09-2008 09:20:19 - Rose Ewing: I don't understand why everyone is always opposed to any kind of change. This would save me and my family time on the road and gas.
02-09-2008 08:05:18 - Gerie C. Martin: This Wal Mart is absolutely unnecessary and will have a huge impact on our infrastructure and environment. They may advertise cheap prices, but in the end we'll all pay a VERY HIGH PRICE!
02-09-2008 06:43:48 - Harley Laing: The size of individual stores on the island should be limited - to say 50-75,000 - 200,000 sq. ft. is just too much, traffic being one ofthe key issues.
02-08-2008 18:48:49 - Bob Stoothoff: Are marketplace is awash in retail space, and population growth has slowed. I don't see the need for another Wal-Mart.
02-08-2008 16:55:08 - Mickey Fuller: It would seem that traffic would be the #1 concern - secondly, the impact on Grayco (whose owners have spent thousands on upgrading the shopping center) and other businesses. I cannot see that Walmart would gain by having 2 superstores within such a few miles - and I'm certainly against it for the reasons stated above.
02-08-2008 16:29:23 - Michael J. O'Regan: Only a additional 5500 trips it will bring? We don't have the infrastructure!
02-08-2008 15:38:04 - Emmie Hamm: I disagree with a large supercenter on Lady's Island. There is no need.
02-08-2008 14:40:43 - Sonny Bishop: No! Increased traffic on 21, a 3 lane road and environmental issues are not worth the convenience. I'll drive to Cross Creek.
02-08-2008 13:13:46 - Dennis Williford, Lady's Island Resident: Can Lady’s Island Afford
Wal-Mart?

• Extreme Gridlock
• More Crime
• Loss of Island Community
• Loss of Local Businesses
• Loss of Down Town Businesses
• Loss of Tourism
• Loss of Local tax infrastructure
• Decreased home values

What does Wal-Mart offer Lady’s Island?

• Environmentally unfriendly
• Depressed wages for the Sea Islands
• Increased taxpayer expense for health care
• Blight from closed local stores
• Increased Taxes
• Unemployment and underemployment
• Convenience
What goals for the City of Beaufort does Wal-Mart NOT support?

• Relieve Traffic Congestion on US 21
• Primary Route Access Control on Major Corridors
• Open Space program
• Diversify Economic Base/ Downtown Redevelopment
• Pursue Alternate Sources of Revenue
That’s 5 out of 8 listed online.

Demand fiscal responsibility for our community
02-08-2008 06:55:16 - Leonard Conapinski: Our road system is not set up to handle the heavy traffic that would ensue. The charm of Lady's Island would be lost forever.
02-07-2008 14:41:05 - Ken Maliken: If I need to go to Wal-Mart I'll go to Burton
02-06-2008 13:18:35 - Everett Ballenger, Broker,ABR,: We all know what happens to a local area when a Wall-Mart opens up. In the right area they are an asset. I don't personally think this location is right for a store like that.